Carrie Underwood’s $800 Million Lawsuit Against Joy Behar: Fact or Fiction?

In recent weeks, social media and online news platforms have been abuzz with a shocking claim: country music superstar Carrie Underwood has allegedly filed an $800 million lawsuit against Joy Behar, co-host of the popular daytime talk show “The View.”

The alleged lawsuit, supposedly stemming from comments made by Behar regarding Underwood’s political affiliations, has generated heated debates among fans, political commentators, and media analysts alike.

However, as with many sensational stories that emerge online, it is crucial to separate fact from fiction. In this article, we will take a deep dive into the origins of this claim, examine whether there is any factual basis to the lawsuit, and explore the broader implications of misinformation in the digital age.
The Origin of the Rumor
The speculation surrounding Carrie Underwood’s lawsuit appears to have originated from a series of viral YouTube videos and social media posts.

One such video, titled “Carrie Underwood SUES The View Host Joy Behar After She Said This On Set About Her Supporting Trump”, was uploaded in late January 2025 and quickly gained traction.

Within days, the video amassed hundreds of thousands of views, leading to a cascade of similar content across various platforms.

Other videos followed suit, with titles like “Joy Behar BEGS Carrie Underwood To STOP Her $800 MILLION Lawsuit Against The View” and “Joy Behar in PANIC MODE Over Carrie Underwood’s $800M Lawsuit.” These sensational headlines further fueled public interest and speculation.

Despite the wildfire spread of these claims, a glaring issue remains: there is no verifiable evidence or credible sources confirming the existence of such a lawsuit.
The Alleged Lawsuit: Examining the Claims
The premise of the rumored lawsuit is that Joy Behar made defamatory remarks about Carrie Underwood during a recent episode of The View, in which she criticized the singer’s purported political leanings and decision to perform at a Donald Trump event.

During a January 2025 episode, Behar was reported to have said:

“How do you love your country and support and normalize somebody who was a convicted felon who really wants to destroy the country, in my opinion?”

These comments, though provocative, fall within the realm of political opinion and commentary. Under U.S. defamation laws, a successful lawsuit would require proving that Behar knowingly made false statements of fact with malicious intent to harm Underwood’s reputation.

Since Behar’s remarks were clearly opinion-based rather than false factual claims, it is unlikely that a lawsuit would hold any legal weight.

Additionally, major news networks and reputable media outlets have not reported on any such legal action taken by Underwood. If an $800 million lawsuit of this magnitude had indeed been filed, it would have been widely covered by mainstream journalism.
The Role of Social Media in Spreading Misinformation
The rapid spread of this baseless claim highlights the power of social media in shaping public narratives. Platforms like YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, and Twitter have become hotbeds for viral misinformation, where sensationalized content often gains traction faster than verified news.

One key factor behind the proliferation of such rumors is the public’s appetite for celebrity drama—especially when it intersects with politics. In recent years, political affiliations of celebrities have become a lightning rod for controversy, further intensifying online debates.

This case underscores the importance of digital literacy and critical thinking. In an era where misinformation spreads rapidly, it is essential for consumers to verify claims through credible sources rather than relying on unverified social media posts and clickbait videos.
Why Would Such a Lawsuit Be Unlikely?
From a legal standpoint, several factors make the prospect of an $800 million lawsuit highly improbable:

Defamation Laws – U.S. defamation laws require plaintiffs to prove that false and damaging statements were made with actual malice. Behar’s statements, however controversial, are protected under the First Amendment as political opinion.
Lack of Credible Reporting – No reputable news outlet has corroborated the claim that Underwood has filed or is considering legal action against Behar or The View.
The Unrealistic Dollar Amount – Lawsuits of this scale are extremely rare, particularly for defamation cases. The notion that Underwood would seek $800 million—an astronomical sum—further raises doubts about the credibility of the claim.
Underwood’s History of Avoiding Political Controversy – Unlike some celebrities who frequently engage in political discourse, Carrie Underwood has largely steered clear of political controversies. It seems unlikely that she would suddenly file such a high-profile lawsuit over political comments.

The Impact of False Claims on Public Perception
False claims like this one not only mislead the public but also contribute to a broader issue: the erosion of trust in journalism and media. When unverified rumors gain widespread attention, they create confusion and distract from legitimate news stories.

Moreover, such misinformation can have real-world consequences. For instance, fans who believe the lawsuit to be true may develop unwarranted animosity toward either Underwood or Behar.

Similarly, it can distort political discussions by adding a layer of fictitious controversy to an already polarized environment.

Carrie Underwood and Joy Behar’s Silence on the Matter
As of now, neither Carrie Underwood nor Joy Behar has publicly addressed these lawsuit rumors. The lack of response from both parties further suggests that this claim is nothing more than an internet hoax.

If a lawsuit of this magnitude were legitimate, one would expect statements from Underwood’s legal team or at least some acknowledgment from Behar and The View.

The silence from both sides reinforces the likelihood that this is a fabricated story, designed to generate clicks and engagement rather than to report factual information.
Conclusion: A Lesson in Media Literacy
The story of Carrie Underwood’s alleged $800 million lawsuit against Joy Behar serves as a clear example of how misinformation can spread unchecked in the digital age. Despite its widespread circulation, there is no concrete evidence to support the existence of such legal action.

This case highlights the importance of fact-checking and critical thinking when consuming news, particularly in an era where clickbait and sensationalism often override journalistic integrity.

Before believing and sharing claims seen on social media, individuals should turn to credible news sources and verify the information.

In the end, while the rumor may have made for entertaining online discourse, it ultimately serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of misinformation and the responsibility we all share in ensuring the truth prevails.