Oscar Robertson Takes a Swipe at Modern Basketball and Stephen Curry: “If You Can Dunk or Make a Three-Point Shot, You’re the Greatest Thing Since Sliced Bread”
Oscar Robertson, one of the greatest players in NBA history and a pioneer of the triple-double, has never shied away from voicing his opinions about the evolution of basketball. In an era dominated by long-range shooting and high-flying dunks, Robertson has often critiqued the modern game, particularly its overemphasis on certain skills. One of his most notable remarks came when he took aim at today’s NBA and Stephen Curry, saying, “If you can dunk or make a three-point shot, you’re the greatest thing since sliced bread.”
This comment, while not directly targeting Curry, reflects Robertson’s frustration with what he perceives as a lack of balance and fundamentals in modern basketball. The remark sparked a debate among fans, players, and analysts about the changes in the game and how legends like Robertson view today’s superstars.
The Context of Robertson’s Critique
Oscar Robertson’s statement came during an interview in which he discussed the state of the NBA and how it has evolved since his playing days in the 1960s and 1970s. Known as “The Big O,” Robertson revolutionized the game with his all-around abilities, becoming the first player in NBA history to average a triple-double for an entire season.
For Robertson, basketball was about mastering every facet of the game—passing, rebounding, defending, and scoring. However, as the NBA has leaned heavily into analytics, favoring three-point shooting and athleticism, he believes the game has lost some of its nuance.
The Rise of Stephen Curry and Modern Basketball
Stephen Curry is often seen as the face of the modern NBA. His revolutionary three-point shooting has reshaped the league, leading to an era where teams attempt record numbers of three-pointers every season. Curry’s ability to hit deep shots with remarkable accuracy has made him one of the most influential players of all time, earning him two MVP awards and four championships with the Golden State Warriors.
While Curry’s style of play has earned him widespread acclaim, it has also drawn criticism from traditionalists like Robertson. For players who thrived in earlier eras, the focus on three-point shooting can feel like an oversimplification of the game. Robertson’s comment highlights this sentiment, suggesting that today’s players are celebrated for excelling in just one or two areas, rather than being well-rounded athletes.
A Clash of Eras: Skill Sets and Strategy
Robertson’s critique is rooted in the differences between his era and the current one. In the 1960s, basketball was dominated by mid-range shooting, post play, and physicality. Three-point shots were non-existent until the 1979-80 season, and athleticism was complemented by a strong emphasis on fundamentals. Players were often required to excel in multiple areas to succeed.
In contrast, today’s NBA prioritizes efficiency, with an emphasis on three-point shooting, spacing, and pace. Analytics have shown that three-pointers and shots at the rim are statistically more valuable than mid-range attempts, leading teams to design offenses around these principles. While this has resulted in higher-scoring games, critics argue that it has made the game more predictable.
The Debate Over Stephen Curry’s Legacy
While Robertson’s remark wasn’t an outright dismissal of Curry’s greatness, it did imply skepticism about the criteria used to evaluate today’s players. For Robertson, the focus on shooting and dunking overlooks other critical aspects of the game, such as defense, court vision, and basketball IQ.
However, many disagree with this view. Curry is widely regarded as one of the most complete offensive players in NBA history, with elite ball-handling, playmaking, and leadership skills to complement his shooting. His ability to stretch defenses and create opportunities for his teammates has fundamentally changed how the game is played.
Basketball analysts have also pointed out that Curry’s impact extends beyond his scoring. He has elevated the Warriors into one of the most dominant dynasties in NBA history, proving his ability to succeed in high-pressure moments and against elite competition.
Respect for Both Eras
Despite his critiques, Robertson has also expressed admiration for the skill level of today’s players. He has acknowledged the incredible athleticism and talent on display in the modern NBA, even if he doesn’t fully embrace the game’s current direction.
Similarly, modern players like Curry have shown respect for legends like Robertson, often crediting them for paving the way. Curry himself has spoken about the importance of understanding basketball’s history and learning from past generations.
The Bigger Picture: Evolving the Game
It’s worth noting that many of the game’s greatest players, including Michael Jordan and Magic Johnson, have expressed similar concerns about the modern NBA. This reflects a natural tendency for athletes to view their era as the pinnacle of competition, even as the game continues to grow and change.
Conclusion: Bridging the Gap Between Generations
Oscar Robertson’s swipe at modern basketball and Stephen Curry underscores the ongoing debate about what defines greatness in the NBA. While Robertson may lament the emphasis on three-point shooting and dunking, Curry’s impact on the game is undeniable. Both players, in their own ways, have shaped basketball’s history, leaving legacies that will inspire future generations.
As fans and analysts, it’s important to appreciate the contributions of players from every era. Whether it’s Robertson’s triple-doubles or Curry’s deep threes, each has added to the richness of basketball’s story, proving that greatness comes in many forms.
